Elastic and Inelastic Collisions

Two snooker balls click and spring apart. A car folds itself around a lamp-post and stops dead. A lump of clay slaps into a wall and just… sticks. All three are collisions — bodies meeting and pushing on each other for a fleeting instant — yet they end in wildly different ways. The balls keep almost all their bounce; the car keeps none; the clay keeps none and travels on stuck to whatever it hit.

There is one thing every isolated collision has in common, and one thing that separates them. The shared law is the conservation of momentum: with no outside forces, the total momentum after equals the total momentum before, always. What differs is what happens to the kinetic energy — and that single question, "was the kinetic energy kept or lost?", is what sorts every collision into elastic or inelastic.

Momentum always survives — kinetic energy is the question

Take two bodies of mass m_1, m_2 approaching with velocities u_1, u_2 and leaving with velocities v_1, v_2. Because the system is isolated, momentum is conserved in every case:

m_1 u_1 + m_2 u_2 = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2.

This single equation is true whether the bodies bounce, crumple, or stick. But it is only one equation, and after a collision there are usually two unknown velocities — so on its own it is not enough to solve everything. The extra information comes from the kinetic energy, and that is exactly where collisions split into two families.

What is conserved in a collision

For two bodies colliding in an isolated system:

These four traps catch almost everyone learning collisions:

Perfectly inelastic: worked example (they stick together)

A 1200\ \text{kg} car travelling at 15\ \text{m/s} runs into the back of a stationary 800\ \text{kg} car; their bumpers lock and they move off together. Find (a) their common velocity and (b) the kinetic energy lost.

Step 1 — conserve momentum. Only the first car is moving, so u_2 = 0. They stick, so afterwards both share one velocity v:

m_1 u_1 + m_2 u_2 = (m_1 + m_2)\,v \;\Rightarrow\; 1200 \times 15 + 0 = (1200 + 800)\,v. 18\,000 = 2000\,v \;\Rightarrow\; v = 9\ \text{m/s}.

Step 2 — kinetic energy before.

E_k^{\text{before}} = \tfrac12 \times 1200 \times 15^2 + 0 = \tfrac12 \times 1200 \times 225 = 135\,000\ \text{J} = 135\ \text{kJ}.

Step 3 — kinetic energy after (one lump of 2000\ \text{kg} moving at 9\ \text{m/s}):

E_k^{\text{after}} = \tfrac12 \times 2000 \times 9^2 = \tfrac12 \times 2000 \times 81 = 81\,000\ \text{J} = 81\ \text{kJ}.

Step 4 — the loss.

\Delta E_k = 135 - 81 = 54\ \text{kJ lost}.

Forty per cent of the kinetic energy has gone — into crumpled metal, a bang, and warmth. Momentum, in contrast, is untouched: 2000 \times 9 = 18\,000\ \text{kg·m/s}, exactly what the moving car brought with it.

Elastic: worked example (the bounce that keeps its energy)

A 2\ \text{kg} ball moving at 3\ \text{m/s} strikes a stationary 1\ \text{kg} ball head-on in a perfectly elastic collision. Find both velocities afterwards.

Now we have two conservation laws — momentum and kinetic energy — so two equations for the two unknowns v_1, v_2:

2(3) + 1(0) = 2 v_1 + 1 v_2 \;\Rightarrow\; 6 = 2 v_1 + v_2, \tfrac12 (2)(3^2) = \tfrac12 (2) v_1^2 + \tfrac12 (1) v_2^2 \;\Rightarrow\; 9 = v_1^2 + \tfrac12 v_2^2.

Solving the pair (the trivial "no collision" answer v_1 = 3,\ v_2 = 0 is rejected) gives

v_1 = 1\ \text{m/s}, \qquad v_2 = 4\ \text{m/s}.

Check both laws. Momentum: 2(1) + 1(4) = 6 ✓. Kinetic energy: \tfrac12(2)(1^2) + \tfrac12(1)(4^2) = 1 + 8 = 9\ \text{J} ✓ — every joule accounted for, so the collision really is elastic.

For a perfectly elastic head-on collision between two equal masses, the algebra collapses to a beautiful result: the two bodies simply exchange velocities.

v_1 = u_2, \qquad v_2 = u_1.

A moving ball striking an identical stationary one stops dead and sends the target off at its own former speed — the trick behind every Newton's cradle.

Is this collision elastic? Check the kinetic energy

Sometimes you are handed all four velocities and asked which kind of collision it was. The recipe is simple: momentum will balance either way, so the test is the kinetic energy — work out the total before and after and compare.

A 4\ \text{kg} trolley moving at 5\ \text{m/s} hits a stationary 4\ \text{kg} trolley. Afterwards the first moves at 1\ \text{m/s} and the second at 4\ \text{m/s} (same direction). Elastic or inelastic?

Momentum check first (it must balance for the data to be valid): 4(5) = 20 before, 4(1) + 4(4) = 20 after ✓.

Now the kinetic energy:

E_k^{\text{before}} = \tfrac12(4)(5^2) = 50\ \text{J}, E_k^{\text{after}} = \tfrac12(4)(1^2) + \tfrac12(4)(4^2) = 2 + 32 = 34\ \text{J}.

Kinetic energy has fallen from 50\ \text{J} to 34\ \text{J} — a loss of 16\ \text{J}. So although momentum is perfectly conserved, this collision is inelastic. Had the two totals been equal, it would have been elastic.

Explosions: a collision run backwards

An explosion is the mirror image of a perfectly inelastic collision. There, two bodies merge and lose kinetic energy; here, one body flies apart and gains kinetic energy — released from a chemical, elastic or nuclear store inside it. Yet momentum is still conserved: if the object started at rest, the total momentum was zero, so the fragments must fly off with momenta that cancel exactly.

A stationary 3\ \text{kg} firework bursts into a 1\ \text{kg} piece and a 2\ \text{kg} piece. The light piece shoots off at 4\ \text{m/s}. How fast, and which way, does the heavy piece go?

0 = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2 \;\Rightarrow\; 0 = 1(4) + 2 v_2 \;\Rightarrow\; v_2 = -2\ \text{m/s}.

The minus sign says the 2\ \text{kg} piece flies off at 2\ \text{m/s} in the opposite direction — a small heavy chunk kicking back against a light fast one, just like a gun recoiling against its bullet. The kinetic energy, meanwhile, has climbed from nothing to \tfrac12(1)(4^2) + \tfrac12(2)(2^2) = 8 + 4 = 12\ \text{J}, drawn straight from the gunpowder. Momentum conserved; kinetic energy created from a store — the reverse of a crash.

Play with a collision

Set the mass and starting velocity of each cart, then pick the collision type. The figure works out the velocities after the collision (momentum is always conserved) and draws a bar for the total kinetic energy before and after. Watch the key pattern: switching from elastic to inelastic to stick together leaves the momentum untouched but makes the "after" energy bar shrink further and further — with the perfectly inelastic case losing the most.

It feels backwards, but a car is deliberately built to crumple. A rigid car would rebound from a wall almost elastically, reversing your velocity and subjecting you to a huge, sudden change in momentum in a tiny time — a brutal force. A crumple zone turns the crash into a very inelastic one: the folding metal soaks up the kinetic energy as heat and deformation, and it spreads the change in momentum over a longer time, so the force on the passengers drops. The same logic runs through airbags, crash mats, cricketers drawing their hands back, and a boxer "rolling" with a punch. Meanwhile a Newton's cradle shows off the opposite ideal: its hardened steel balls collide almost perfectly elastically, so the click of energy passes clean through the row and one ball swings up on the far side — over and over, losing only the little that leaks away as sound and warmth.