Euler and Bernoulli
A jumbo jet weighing 350 tonnes hangs in the air, held up by nothing but
moving fluid. A pitcher makes a baseball swerve sideways in flight. A perfume atomiser lifts liquid up
a tube using only a puff of air, and a partly-blocked artery can quietly balloon into an aneurysm.
These wildly different events share one underlying rule: in a smoothly flowing fluid,
where the flow speeds up, the pressure drops. That single sentence — made precise —
is Bernoulli's theorem, and it falls straight out of Newton's second law once we
learn to write it for a fluid.
This page does exactly that. First we apply \mathbf{F} = m\mathbf{a} to a
tiny fluid parcel to get Euler's equation for an ideal (frictionless) fluid. Then, by
integrating it along a streamline for steady incompressible flow, we squeeze out the famous
conserved combination p + \tfrac12\rho v^2 + \rho g z. Finally we read that
combination as an energy budget and use it to explain lift, the Venturi throat, and
the Pitot tube that tells an aircraft how fast it is going.
Euler's equation: Newton's second law for a fluid parcel
Take a small blob of fluid — a parcel — of volume \delta V and
mass \delta m = \rho\,\delta V. Newton's second law says its mass times its
acceleration equals the net force on it. The subtle part is the acceleration: because the parcel moves
with the flow, the acceleration it actually feels is the
material
derivative of the velocity, D\mathbf{u}/Dt, not the plain
\partial\mathbf{u}/\partial t.
For an ideal (inviscid) fluid — one with no viscosity, so neighbouring parcels
exert no sideways drag on each other — only two forces act on the parcel: the
pressure of the surrounding fluid squeezing on its faces, and gravity.
A pressure that varies across the parcel gives a net push from high pressure toward low, of
size -\nabla p per unit volume; gravity contributes
\rho\mathbf{g} per unit volume. Dividing Newton's law by
\delta V gives Euler's equation:
\rho\,\frac{D\mathbf{u}}{Dt} = \rho\left(\frac{\partial \mathbf{u}}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u}\right) = -\nabla p + \rho\,\mathbf{g}.
Read it term by term and it is nothing but m\mathbf{a} = \mathbf{F} written
per unit volume: \rho\,D\mathbf{u}/Dt is "mass × acceleration",
while -\nabla p (the pressure-gradient force) and
\rho\mathbf{g} (weight) are the forces. Euler derived it in 1757; drop the
one thing it ignores — viscosity — back in and you get the full
\text{Navier–Stokes} equations. So Euler is Navier–Stokes with the friction
switched off, and it is the honest starting point for lift, waves, and flow through pipes.
From Euler to Bernoulli: integrating along a streamline
Now specialise to the case that covers an enormous fraction of real flows: steady
(\partial\mathbf{u}/\partial t = 0), incompressible
(\rho constant), and inviscid. Take Euler's equation and
follow one streamline, the curve everywhere tangent to the flow. Using the vector
identity (\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{u} = \nabla(\tfrac12 v^2) - \mathbf{u}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{u})
and projecting onto the streamline direction (where the last term drops out, because it is
perpendicular to \mathbf{u}), Euler's equation becomes a
total derivative along the arc-length s:
\frac{d}{ds}\left(\tfrac12\rho v^2 + p + \rho g z\right) = 0.
If the derivative along the streamline is zero, the quantity in brackets does not change as you move
along that streamline — it is a constant of the flow. That is Bernoulli's theorem.
-
Euler's equation (its parent) is Newton's second law for an inviscid fluid parcel:
\rho\,D\mathbf{u}/Dt = -\nabla p + \rho\mathbf{g}.
-
The Bernoulli constant. For steady, incompressible, inviscid flow, along any
single streamline
p + \tfrac12\rho v^2 + \rho g z = \text{constant}.
Equivalently, between two points 1 and 2 on the
same streamline,
p_1 + \tfrac12\rho v_1^2 + \rho g z_1 = p_2 + \tfrac12\rho v_2^2 + \rho g z_2.
-
The assumptions matter. It requires the flow to be steady,
incompressible, and inviscid, and the two points to lie on the same
streamline (unless the flow is also irrotational, in which case the constant is the same
everywhere).
Reading it as energy: pressure, kinetic, potential
Every term in Bernoulli's equation has units of energy per unit volume
(\text{J/m}^3 = \text{Pa}). So the theorem is a statement of
energy conservation for a parcel of ideal fluid: as it flows along a streamline, its
energy budget simply shuffles between three pockets whose total never changes.
-
\tfrac12\rho v^2 — the kinetic energy per unit volume,
also called the dynamic pressure q. Speed up and this
grows.
-
\rho g z — the gravitational potential energy per unit
volume. Climb and this grows.
-
p — the static pressure, the flow-work the surrounding
fluid can do; behaving like a stored pressure energy per unit volume.
The consequence is immediate and is the heart of the whole subject: at the same height,
if a parcel speeds up, its \tfrac12\rho v^2 pocket fills, so to keep the
total fixed its pressure pocket p must empty. Faster
flow means lower pressure. Not because speed "causes" low pressure by magic, but because energy
is conserved and it has to come from somewhere.
The Venturi: watch the trade happen
Push an incompressible fluid through a tube that narrows to a throat and widens again.
Because the same volume per second must pass every cross-section (that is
continuity,
A_1 v_1 = A_2 v_2), the flow has to go faster where the tube is
narrower. Bernoulli then insists the pressure there must be lower. In the figure the
streamlines physically crowd together at the throat — a visual signature of faster flow — and that is
exactly where a pressure gauge reads its minimum.
The graph below makes the trade-off quantitative. Along the tube, the relative flow speed
rises to a peak at the throat while the relative pressure falls to a trough at the very
same place — a mirror image. Their sum (kinetic + pressure energy, at constant height) is what stays
constant.
Worked examples
Example 1 — pressure drop in a Venturi. Water (\rho = 1000\ \text{kg/m}^3)
flows horizontally through a Venturi. In the wide inlet the speed is
v_1 = 2\ \text{m/s} at pressure p_1 = 120\ \text{kPa};
at the throat continuity gives v_2 = 6\ \text{m/s}. Since the height is
constant, the \rho g z terms cancel and Bernoulli reads
p_2 = p_1 + \tfrac12\rho\left(v_1^2 - v_2^2\right) = 120{,}000 + \tfrac12(1000)(2^2 - 6^2).
p_2 = 120{,}000 + 500\,(4 - 36) = 120{,}000 - 16{,}000 = 104\ \text{kPa}.
The pressure falls by 16\ \text{kPa} at the throat — enough to suck fuel into
a carburettor or lift dye up a side-tube.
Example 2 — a Pitot tube measures airspeed. An aircraft's Pitot tube has one opening
facing the flow, where the air is brought to rest (a stagnation point,
v = 0, pressure p_0), and a side opening reading the
undisturbed static pressure p where the air still moves at the
flight speed v. Same height, so Bernoulli gives
p_0 = p + \tfrac12\rho v^2, and solving for the speed,
v = \sqrt{\frac{2\,(p_0 - p)}{\rho}}.
With a stagnation-minus-static difference of p_0 - p = 600\ \text{Pa} in air
of density \rho = 1.2\ \text{kg/m}^3,
v = \sqrt{2(600)/1.2} = \sqrt{1000} \approx 31.6\ \text{m/s} — about
114\ \text{km/h}. The difference p_0 - p = \tfrac12\rho v^2
is exactly the dynamic pressure.
Example 3 — Torricelli's law (a leaking tank). A tank of water has a small hole a
depth h below the free surface. Take a streamline from the calm top surface
(pressure atmospheric, speed \approx 0) down to the jet at the hole (also at
atmospheric pressure, since it exits into the air). The pressure terms cancel and Bernoulli reduces to
\tfrac12\rho v^2 = \rho g h, so
v = \sqrt{2 g h}.
For h = 5\ \text{m} and g = 10\ \text{m/s}^2,
v = \sqrt{100} = 10\ \text{m/s}. Strikingly, this is the very speed the water
would reach if it simply fell the height h — the pressure energy at
depth has been perfectly cashed in for kinetic energy.
No — and this is the most famous wrong explanation in all of physics. The popular tale says: the wing
is more curved on top, so air going over the top has "further to travel" and must speed up to
rejoin its partner at the trailing edge at the same time; faster flow, lower pressure, lift.
Every step after "faster flow, lower pressure" is fine, but the premise is simply false.
There is no law of nature that forces two parcels split at the leading edge to arrive together at the
back. Measurements and simulations show the air over the top actually arrives much sooner — it
does not wait for the underside.
What is true: the air over the top really is faster, and by Bernoulli the pressure there really is lower,
and that pressure difference really does produce most of the lift. The reason it goes faster is
the way the wing's shape and angle of attack turn the flow (circulation), not a fictitious meeting
appointment. Keep the conclusion, bin the "equal transit time" justification.
Bernoulli's constant is guaranteed the same only along a single streamline. It is
tempting to compare the fast air over a wing with slow air far below it and conclude "faster ⇒ lower
pressure" as a universal law — but those two points are on different streamlines, and in general
each streamline carries its own Bernoulli constant. Comparing across streamlines is only
rigorous when the flow is also irrotational (no local spin,
\nabla\times\mathbf{u} = 0), in which case that leftover
\mathbf{u}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{u}) term vanishes everywhere and the
constant becomes global.
The other three assumptions bite too. In a viscous boundary layer, or across a
shock where the gas is compressible, or in an unsteady gust, the tidy
p + \tfrac12\rho v^2 + \rho g z = \text{const} quietly fails. Bernoulli is a
superb tool, but it is a tool with a spec sheet: steady, incompressible, inviscid, one streamline.