Radius of Convergence

A power series \sum c_n (x-a)^n converges for some values of x and diverges for others. Remarkably, the convergence set is never a ragged scatter — it is always an interval centred at a. There is a number R \in [0, \infty], the radius of convergence, such that the series

Only the two endpoints x = a \pm R are left undecided — each must be checked by hand. The job of this page is to compute R, and the tool is the ratio test.

Deriving the radius from the ratio test

The ratio test looks at the limiting ratio of consecutive terms of a series \sum u_n: if \lim |u_{n+1}/u_n| = L, the series converges absolutely when L < 1 and diverges when L > 1. Apply it to the power series with u_n = c_n (x-a)^n.

Step 1 — form the ratio of consecutive terms.

\left|\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}\right| = \left|\frac{c_{n+1}(x-a)^{n+1}}{c_n (x-a)^n}\right| = \left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right|\,|x - a|.

Step 2 — take the limit. Suppose the coefficient ratio settles to a limit, \displaystyle \lim_{n\to\infty}\left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \ell. Since |x-a| is a constant, it pulls outside the limit:

L = \lim_{n\to\infty}\left|\frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}\right| = \ell \,|x - a|.

Step 3 — impose the convergence condition. The ratio test demands L < 1 for convergence:

\ell\,|x - a| < 1 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad |x - a| < \frac{1}{\ell}.

Step 4 — read off the radius. Comparing with |x - a| < R, the radius is the reciprocal of the coefficient ratio:

\boxed{\,R = \frac{1}{\ell} = \lim_{n\to\infty}\left|\frac{c_n}{c_{n+1}}\right|\,}

with the natural conventions R = \infty when \ell = 0 (the terms shrink so fast the series converges everywhere) and R = 0 when \ell = \infty (it converges only at the centre).

Three worked radii

(a) \sum x^n/n! gives R = \infty. Here c_n = 1/n!, so

\left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \frac{n!}{(n+1)!} = \frac{1}{n+1} \to 0 = \ell \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R = \frac{1}{0} = \infty.

Converges for every x — this is the series for e^x.

(b) \sum n!\,x^n gives R = 0. Now c_n = n!, so

\left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \frac{(n+1)!}{n!} = n+1 \to \infty = \ell \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R = \frac{1}{\infty} = 0.

Converges only at x = 0 — a power series that is barely a function at all.

(c) \sum x^n/n gives R = 1, endpoints differing. Here c_n = 1/n:

\left|\frac{c_{n+1}}{c_n}\right| = \frac{n}{n+1} \to 1 = \ell \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R = 1.

So it converges on (-1, 1) and diverges outside [-1, 1]. The endpoints must be tested separately. At x = 1 the series is \sum 1/n, the harmonic series — diverges. At x = -1 it is \sum (-1)^n/n, the alternating harmonic series — converges. The interval of convergence is therefore [-1, 1): same radius, different fates at the two ends.

For a power series \sum c_n (x-a)^n there is a radius R \in [0, \infty] such that:

The three worked examples are the three archetypes, and they are genuinely different species of object:

The endpoint subtlety in case (b) of the worked example — [-1,1) — is not a blemish but the whole story: the radius is a blunt instrument that locates the boundary, and the fine question of what happens on the boundary needs the convergence tests for ordinary numerical series, including the alternating-series test that rescued x = -1.

See the interval shrink and grow

Consider the family \sum n^{p}\, x^n, with a slider for the exponent p. The coefficient ratio |c_n/c_{n+1}| = (n/(n+1))^{p} \to 1 for every p, so the radius is always R = 1 — the shaded band on the number line below stays fixed at (-1, 1). What changes with p is how fast the terms decay, and so how convincingly the partial sums (the curve) settle inside the band and blow up outside it. The vertical dashed lines mark the boundary x = \pm R.