Bernoulli Equations
The hook: a nonlinear equation in disguise
You now have a complete recipe for the
first-order linear
equation y' + P(x)\,y = Q(x): form the integrating factor
\mu = e^{\int P\,dx}, collapse the left side into a product derivative, and
integrate. But the moment the right side sprouts a power of y —
y' + P(x)\,y = Q(x)\,y^{2},
the machinery jams. That y^2 makes the equation nonlinear:
y now appears squared, so no integrating factor can turn the left side into a
clean product derivative, and the variables refuse to separate either. It looks like a dead end.
It isn't. This whole family — y' + P(x)\,y = Q(x)\,y^{n} — is a
Bernoulli equation, and it hides a linear equation inside. One well-chosen
substitution peels away the nonlinearity and hands you back exactly the linear problem you already
know how to solve. It is the first great lesson of differential equations: the right change of
variable can turn a hard problem into an easy one you have already met.
What counts as a Bernoulli equation
A first-order ODE is Bernoulli when it can be written in the standard shape
\frac{dy}{dx} + P(x)\,y = Q(x)\,y^{\,n},\qquad n \neq 0,\ 1.
The coefficients P and Q may be any functions of
x; the whole nonlinearity is packed into the single power
y^{\,n} on the right. The exponent n can be any
real number — 2, 3, \tfrac12,
even -1 — except 0 and
1, and we will see in a moment exactly why those two are barred.
Before you do anything else, always arrange the equation so the coefficient of
y' is 1 and everything with a bare
y (first power) is on the left, with the lone y^n
term on the right. Only once it is in this exact shape can you read off P,
Q and n.
The trick, derived: v = y^{1-n}
Watch the nonlinearity dissolve. Start from the standard form and divide every term by
y^{\,n}:
y^{-n}\,y' + P(x)\,y^{\,1-n} = Q(x).
Two things now carry the same exponent 1-n: the term
y^{\,1-n} outright, and — after the chain rule —
y^{-n}y' as well. That is the clue. Define the new unknown
v = y^{\,1-n}.
Differentiate with the chain rule:
v' = (1-n)\,y^{-n}\,y', so the awkward first term is
y^{-n}y' = \dfrac{v'}{\,1-n\,}. Substitute both pieces into the divided
equation:
\frac{v'}{1-n} + P(x)\,v = Q(x).
Finally multiply through by (1-n) to clear the fraction, and the equation
stands revealed as linear in v:
\boxed{\,v' + (1-n)\,P(x)\,v = (1-n)\,Q(x).}
There is no v^2, no v^n — just
v and v' to the first power. This is a
first-order linear equation, so hit it with the integrating factor
\mu = e^{\int (1-n)P\,dx}, solve for v(x), and
then back-substitute v = y^{1-n} to recover
y. Four moves: substitute → linearise → solve → back-substitute.
Worked example 1: y' + y = y^{2}
Read off the parts: P = 1, Q = 1, and the power
is n = 2. Since n \neq 0,1, it is genuinely
Bernoulli.
Step 1 — choose the substitution.
v = y^{\,1-n} = y^{-1}, so v' = -y^{-2}y'.
Step 2 — linearise. Divide the equation by y^2:
y^{-2}y' + y^{-1} = 1. Since y^{-2}y' = -v' and
y^{-1} = v, this becomes -v' + v = 1, i.e.
v' - v = -1.
(Same answer straight from the boxed formula:
v' + (1-n)Pv = (1-n)Q with 1-n=-1 gives
v' - v = -1. ✓)
Step 3 — solve the linear equation. Here the linear coefficient is
-1, so the integrating factor is
\mu = e^{\int -1\,dx} = e^{-x}. Multiply through:
\big(e^{-x}v\big)' = -e^{-x} \;\Longrightarrow\; e^{-x}v = e^{-x} + C \;\Longrightarrow\; v = 1 + C\,e^{x}.
Step 4 — back-substitute v = y^{-1} = 1/y:
\boxed{\,y = \frac{1}{1 + C\,e^{x}}.}
Sanity check. With y = (1+Ce^{x})^{-1} we get
y' = -Ce^{x}(1+Ce^{x})^{-2}, so
y' + y = \dfrac{-Ce^{x} + (1+Ce^{x})}{(1+Ce^{x})^{2}} = \dfrac{1}{(1+Ce^{x})^{2}} = y^{2}.
✓ The nonlinear equation is solved — via a detour through a linear one.
-
Recognise the form y' + P(x)y = Q(x)y^{n} with
n \neq 0, 1 (get the coefficient of y' to
1 first).
-
Substitute v = y^{\,1-n}. This turns the equation into
the linear ODE v' + (1-n)\,P(x)\,v = (1-n)\,Q(x).
-
Solve that linear equation for v(x) with the
integrating factor \mu = e^{\int (1-n)P\,dx}.
-
Back-substitute v = y^{1-n} to recover
y; an initial condition fixes C.
Three slips sink most Bernoulli attempts. Guard against all three:
-
The substitution is v = y^{\,1-n}, not
y^{\,n}. For y^2
(n=2) that means v = y^{-1}, not
y^{2}. A wrong exponent leaves a stubborn nonlinear term behind and the
method quietly fails.
-
The factor (1-n) multiplies the whole equation.
When you linearise, both P and Q pick up the
factor (1-n). Track it: for n = 2 it is
-1, which flips the sign of both coefficients — forget it and every
sign downstream is wrong.
-
n = 0 and n = 1 are NOT Bernoulli.
Do not force the substitution there (see the next box for what they really are).
Worked example 2: y' + \tfrac{1}{x}\,y = x\,y^{2}
Now P = \tfrac1x, Q = x, and again
n = 2, so v = y^{1-n} = y^{-1} and
1 - n = -1.
Step 1 — linearise straight from the boxed formula
v' + (1-n)Pv = (1-n)Q:
v' - \frac{1}{x}\,v = -x.
Step 2 — integrating factor. The linear coefficient is
-\tfrac1x, so
\mu = e^{\int -\frac{1}{x}\,dx} = e^{-\ln x} = \dfrac{1}{x}. Multiply the
linear equation through by \tfrac1x; the left side collapses:
\left(\frac{v}{x}\right)' = -1 \;\Longrightarrow\; \frac{v}{x} = -x + C \;\Longrightarrow\; v = Cx - x^{2}.
Step 3 — back-substitute v = 1/y:
\boxed{\,y = \frac{1}{Cx - x^{2}} = \frac{1}{x\,(C - x)}.}
Notice how a variable-coefficient Bernoulli equation is no harder than a constant one: once the
substitution has done its work, you are simply running the integrating-factor recipe on
v, exactly as in the linear lesson.
Why n = 0 and n = 1 are excluded
The exclusions are not an arbitrary rule — those two powers make the equation something you already
know, so the Bernoulli detour would be pointless (and the substitution even breaks down):
-
n = 0: then y^{n} = y^{0} = 1
and the equation is y' + P y = Q — already first-order linear.
Nothing to transform.
-
n = 1: then y^{n} = y, so the
equation is y' + Py = Qy, i.e. y' + (P-Q)y = 0 —
homogeneous linear, hence separable: \tfrac{dy}{y} = (Q-P)\,dx.
And the substitution itself dies here, because v = y^{1-1} = y^{0} = 1 is
a constant carrying no information (and the factor (1-n) = 0 would wipe
out the whole equation).
So the honest Bernoulli cases — where the substitution earns its keep — are precisely
n \neq 0, 1.
This equation was posed by Jacob Bernoulli in 1695 and solved shortly after by his
younger brother (and bitter rival) Johann and by Leibniz — the same tight circle
that had just invented calculus. The Bernoullis were a dynasty of mathematicians so prolific that
"Bernoulli's equation" is ambiguous: this one lives in differential equations, while a
different Bernoulli equation governs the pressure of flowing fluids, and Bernoulli numbers,
Bernoulli trials and the Bernoulli distribution turn up in analysis and probability. Eight
Bernoullis across three generations did serious mathematics — a family feud conducted almost
entirely in theorems.
The solution family, live
Below is the family y = \dfrac{1}{1 + C e^{x}} that solved example 1. Slide
the constant C (fixed in practice by an initial value). Every curve slips
smoothly from 1 on the far left toward 0 on the
right — the logistic-style profile that the nonlinear y^2 term produces, all
recovered by back-substituting a plain linear solution.