You've got a bag of 738 sweets and 6 friends to share them with (yourself included). Everyone must get exactly the same amount — no arguing. How many sweets does each person get?
That's
Long division repeats the same four steps for every digit of the number you're dividing (the dividend). Say them like a little chant:
We write it in "bus stop" notation: the dividend sits inside the bus shelter, the divisor stands outside on the left, and the answer (the quotient) grows along the roof on top — each answer digit lined up directly above the digit it came from.
Let's settle the sweets:
1 2 3 ← quotient (the answer)
┌────────
6 │ 7 3 8
6 DIVIDE: 6 into 7 goes 1 time. MULTIPLY: 6 × 1 = 6
─
1 3 SUBTRACT: 7 − 6 = 1. BRING DOWN the 3 → 13
1 2 DIVIDE: 6 into 13 goes 2 times. MULTIPLY: 6 × 2 = 12
───
1 8 SUBTRACT: 13 − 12 = 1. BRING DOWN the 8 → 18
1 8 DIVIDE: 6 into 18 goes 3 times. MULTIPLY: 6 × 3 = 18
───
0 SUBTRACT: 18 − 18 = 0 — nothing left, so it divides exactly
So
Real life rarely divides so neatly. Suppose you have 227 stickers to pack into boxes of 4. How many full boxes can you make, and how many stickers are left rattling around?
5 6 ← quotient
┌──────
4 │ 2 2 7
2 0 4 into 22 goes 5 times; 4 × 5 = 20
──
2 7 22 − 20 = 2, bring down the 7 → 27
2 4 4 into 27 goes 6 times; 4 × 6 = 24
──
3 27 − 24 = 3 — and 4 won't go into 3, so we STOP
The
Now read the remainder in context. You can fill 56 full boxes, and 3 stickers are left over (not enough for a 57th box). The remainder is a real thing you can point at — the leftovers.
Sometimes you don't want a leftover — you want to keep going and split the remainder up
too. Just imagine the dividend has a decimal point and a string of zeros after it:
Let's do
0 . 3 7 5 ← quotient
┌────────────
8 │ 3 . 0 0 0
0 8 into 3 goes 0 times, so write 0 · then bring down
3 0 8 into 30 goes 3 times; 8 × 3 = 24
2 4
──
6 0 30 − 24 = 6, bring down a 0 → 60; 8 × 7 = 56
5 6
──
4 0 60 − 56 = 4, bring down a 0 → 40; 8 × 5 = 40
4 0
──
0 40 − 40 = 0 — done, it divides exactly
So
Whether it divides exactly, stops at a remainder, or runs on into decimals, the working is
always the same four steps repeating. Here's the classic two-digit divisor case too, so you can
see the rhythm doesn't change when the divisor gets bigger —
2 7 ← quotient (answer)
┌────────
16 │ 4 3 2
3 2 16 × 2 = 32 (DIVIDE: 43 ÷ 16 = 2, MULTIPLY)
───
1 1 2 43 − 32 = 11 (SUBTRACT), then BRING DOWN the 2 → 112
1 1 2 16 × 7 = 112 (DIVIDE: 112 ÷ 16 = 7, MULTIPLY)
─────
0 112 − 112 = 0 (SUBTRACT) — nothing left, so it divides exactly
The divisor
That last line is a brilliant safety net: multiply your answer back by the divisor, add the
remainder, and you should land exactly on the number you started with. For example 2:
These two traps swallow more marks than anything else — guard against both:
Long division has a fearsome reputation as the trickiest thing in primary maths. But peek under
the hood and it's gentle: it's just repeated subtraction, sped up. Sharing 738
among 6 could be done by taking away 6 again and again and counting how many times — but
that would take 123 subtractions! Long division cleverly takes away big chunks (like
And it hides a beautiful surprise. Because dividing top-by-bottom turns every fraction into a
decimal, some fractions never stop. Try
Before diving into the steps, make a rough estimate — it catches silly errors.
For
If your long division had spat out