Rounding Decimals
Rounding a
decimal works exactly
like rounding a whole number: we swap an awkward number for a tidy nearby one. The only
new question is how many digits after the point we want to keep — that is the
number of decimal places (d.p.).
Here is the whole trick. To round to a given place, look only at the very next digit —
the one just after the place you are keeping:
- that next digit is 5 or more → round up;
- that next digit is 4 or less → round down (keep it as is).
Round 3.47 to 1 d.p. We are keeping one digit
after the point (the 4). The next digit is
7, which is 5 or more, so we round up:
3.47 \approx 3.5
Round 0.832 to 2 d.p. We keep two digits (the
3); the next digit is 2, which is
4 or less, so we round down and drop it:
0.832 \approx 0.83
Why does “5 or more rounds up” work? Because a decimal sits
between two neighbours, and the next digit tells you which half you are in. Rounding to
1 d.p. snaps a number to the nearer tenth — the midpoint between two
tenths is the 5 in the next place, and anything from there on is
closer to the tenth above.
Press play, then replay it. A two-digit decimal appears between its two tenths; we mark the
halfway point, then snap the number to the nearer tenth — that is rounding to
1 decimal place.
Two small things to watch. First, only ever look at the one digit right after your
place — never the whole tail. Rounding 0.749 to 1 d.p. gives
0.7, because the next digit is just 4
(the 9 after it does not get a vote).
Second, rounding up can carry. Rounding 2.96 to 1 d.p., the
next digit is 6, so the 9 rolls over:
2.96 \approx 3.0
A gentle peek ahead: significant figures (s.f.) count from the first
non-zero digit instead of from the decimal point. So 0.00482 to
2 s.f. is 0.0048 — the leading zeros
do not count, and the rule is the same: look at the next digit
(2 here, so round down). The “5 or more” rule never
changes; significant figures just change which digit you are keeping. We will give
this its own page later.
Khan Academy rounds decimals to the nearest tenth here: