Comparing Decimals

At the shop one bag of apples weighs 0.7 kg and another weighs 0.65 kg — which is heavier? Picking the bigger amount means comparing the decimals, and that comes up whenever you weigh things, check prices, or read a measuring scale.

We already know that decimals count smaller and smaller pieces of one — first tenths, then hundredths. To decide which of two decimals is bigger, we use the very same place value, working from the biggest pieces down.

The whole method is just three steps:

So we compare the tenths first. The decimal with more tenths is bigger — you can stop right there. Only if the tenths tie do you move on to the hundredths.

0.7 > 0.65

Here 0.7 wins because it has seven tenths while 0.65 has only six — and seven tenths beats six tenths, no matter what comes after.

Pad with zeros to make them the same length

Lining up is easier when both decimals have the same number of digits after the point. A decimal does not change if we add trailing zeros on the right — they just say "and no more pieces". So 0.5 is exactly the same amount as 0.50:

0.5 = 0.50 = \tfrac{5}{10} = \tfrac{50}{100}

Now stack the pair you want to compare and pad the shorter one. To compare 0.5 and 0.45, write 0.5 as 0.50:

\begin{array}{c} 0.50 \\ 0.45 \end{array} \qquad 5 \text{ tenths} \;>\; 4 \text{ tenths} \;\Rightarrow\; 0.5 > 0.45

The tenths already decide it: 5 tenths beats 4 tenths, so 0.5 > 0.45. We never even needed the hundredths.

Three worked examples

1) Tenths settle it straight away.

0.8 \;?\; 0.74 \;\Rightarrow\; 0.80 \text{ vs } 0.74 \;\Rightarrow\; 8 > 7 \;\Rightarrow\; 0.8 > 0.74

Eight tenths beats seven tenths. The extra 4 in 0.74 is only hundredths — far too small to catch up.

2) The tenths tie, so the hundredths decide.

0.83 \;?\; 0.87 \;\Rightarrow\; 8 = 8 \;\text{(tie)},\; \text{then } 3 < 7 \;\Rightarrow\; 0.83 < 0.87

Both have 8 tenths, so we walk one column right to the hundredths: 3 against 7. Seven wins, so 0.87 is bigger.

3) Whole numbers first of all.

3.4 \;?\; 3.38 \;\Rightarrow\; 3 = 3,\; \text{then } 4 > 3 \;\Rightarrow\; 3.4 > 3.38

The whole-number parts tie at 3, so we compare tenths: 4 tenths beats 3 tenths. Once a column decides, you stop — 3.4 > 3.38.

The two decimal traps that catch everyone:

See it: shaded tenths-strips

Each strip is one whole, cut into ten equal tenths. We shade in the decimal — so 0.7 fills seven tenths and a bit more shades part of the next cell. The longer shaded bar is the bigger decimal, and we highlight its outline. Press Refresh for a new pair to compare.

Watch out for the most common trap: more digits does not mean bigger! 0.65 looks longer than 0.7, so it is tempting to call it the larger number. But length is not value — only place value decides. Compare the tenths first, and 0.7 clearly comes out ahead.

Press play, then replay it. Two decimals between 0 and 1 are plotted on the number line; whichever sits further right is the bigger one, and we say the comparison aloud.

Decimals in real life

Turtle clocked 9.4 seconds in the race; Frog clocked 9.38 seconds. The smaller time is the faster runner. The whole-second parts tie at 9, so compare tenths: 4 tenths against 3 tenths. Frog's 9.38 is the smaller time, so Frog won — even though 9.38 has more digits!

frog 9.38 s  <  turtle 9.4 s

Llama measures 1.5 metres and Goat measures 1.45 metres. Pad the shorter number: 1.5 becomes 1.50. The wholes tie at 1, then the tenths decide — 5 tenths beats 4 tenths. So 1.5 > 1.45 and Llama is taller, even though Goat's number looks longer.

llama 1.5 m  >  goat 1.45 m

One jar holds £0.8 and another holds £0.75. Money is just decimals of a pound, so the same rule works: 0.80 versus 0.75 — eight tenths beats seven tenths. The first jar (£0.80, that is 80p) is worth more than £0.75 (75p).

coin £0.8  >  coin £0.75

Khan Academy compares and orders decimals here: