Options & Payoffs
A financial derivative is a contract whose value derives from
something else — an underlying asset price S (a stock, an index, a
currency). The contract specifies a payoff: a known
function of the underlying that is paid out
at a fixed future date, the maturity T. Nothing
else about the contract matters for its terminal value — only the number
S_T that the underlying happens to print at time
T.
The three workhorse contracts are the call, the put, and the
forward. Each is pinned down by two numbers: the strike
K (a reference price written into the contract) and the maturity
T. The whole of this lesson is reading off, by cases, what each one
pays.
The call payoff, by cases
A European call gives its holder the right, not the obligation, to
buy one unit of the underlying at the strike K at maturity
T. A rational holder exercises that right only when it is worth
something. Split on whether the option finishes in the money
(S_T > K) or out of the money
(S_T \le K).
Step 1 — value the right when S_T > K. The holder
buys at K and immediately sells at the market price
S_T, banking the difference:
\text{payoff} = S_T - K \quad (> 0).
Step 2 — value the right when S_T \le K. Buying at
K something worth only S_T \le K would
lose money, so the holder simply walks away and the option expires worthless:
\text{payoff} = 0.
Step 3 — fuse the two cases. The contract pays the larger of
S_T - K and 0, which is exactly the
positive part (\cdot)^+ = \max(\cdot,\,0):
C_T = \max(S_T - K,\; 0) = (S_T - K)^+.
That single expression encodes both branches — a function of S_T
alone, kinked at the strike. Plotted against S_T it is the famous
hockey stick: flat on the floor up to K, then
rising at slope 1.
The put payoff, by cases
A European put is the mirror image: the right to sell one unit at
the strike K at maturity. Now the holder profits when the price has
fallen below the strike.
Step 1 — when S_T < K: sell at the high strike
K something worth only S_T on the market,
pocketing the gap:
\text{payoff} = K - S_T \quad (> 0).
Step 2 — when S_T \ge K: selling below the market
price is a loss, so the holder declines and the put expires worthless:
\text{payoff} = 0.
Step 3 — fuse. Again the positive part collapses both branches:
P_T = \max(K - S_T,\; 0) = (K - S_T)^+.
Same hockey stick, reflected: it slopes down at slope -1
from a peak of K at S_T = 0, hits the
floor at S_T = K, and stays there.
The forward: an obligation, not a right
A forward contract is the simplest of the three. It is an
obligation — there is no "walk away" — to buy the underlying at
K at maturity. The holder must take delivery at
K and can sell at S_T whatever happens:
F_T = S_T - K,
with no positive part anywhere. Because there is no choice, the payoff is the straight line
S_T - K through the point (K, 0) — it
goes negative when S_T < K. The forward is genuinely the difference
of a call and a put at the same strike, a fact we will exploit in
put–call parity:
(S_T - K)^+ - (K - S_T)^+ = S_T - K.
For strike K and maturity T, the
terminal payoff is a function of the underlying price
S_T alone:
-
European call:
C_T = (S_T - K)^+ = \max(S_T - K,\,0) — the right to buy.
-
European put:
P_T = (K - S_T)^+ = \max(K - S_T,\,0) — the right to sell.
-
Forward:
F_T = S_T - K — the obligation to buy (may be negative).
Every contract has two sides. The long holds the right or obligation as
stated; the short (the writer) takes the opposite payoff,
-(S_T - K)^+ for a written call. The long can never lose more than
the premium paid; the short of a call has unbounded downside as
S_T \to \infty — which is why writing naked calls keeps risk
managers awake.
Before maturity a call's price splits into two parts. Its intrinsic value
is what it would pay if exercised now, (S_t - K)^+; the rest is
time value, the premium for the chance that the price moves favourably
before T. Time value is largest for an at-the-money option and
decays to zero as t \to T, when only intrinsic value survives and
the price collapses onto the hockey stick. Pricing that time value — the area between the
smooth pre-maturity curve and the kinked payoff — is precisely what the
Black–Scholes formula
will compute.
Calls, puts, and forwards are the vanilla derivatives — their payoff depends only
on the final price S_T. Exotic options break
that simplicity by depending on the whole path
(S_t)_{0 \le t \le T}:
-
A barrier option springs into or out of existence if the price ever
touches a level H — e.g. a knock-out call pays
(S_T - K)^+ only if S_t < H for all
t.
-
An Asian option pays off on the average price,
\big(\bar{S} - K\big)^+ with
\bar S = \tfrac1T\int_0^T S_t\,dt, smoothing out end-date
manipulation.
Path-dependence makes exotics far harder to price, but the no-arbitrage machinery we build
next handles them all — the payoff is just a more elaborate function of the path.
Drag the strike, watch the kink move
Below are the two hockey sticks plotted against the terminal price
S_T: the call
(S_T - K)^+ rising to the right of the strike, and the
put (K - S_T)^+ falling away to the left. Slide
K and watch both kinks slide together — the strike is the hinge of
every option payoff.